Editorial Policies

International Journal of Engineering, Management & Technology (IJEMT) framed its publication policy based on the standards established by the www.publicationethics.org and www.oaspa.org.

Our Policies:

IJEMT is an electronic peer-reviewed International monthly Research Journal committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics. To provide our readers with a journal of the highest quality we state the following principles of Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement. All articles not in accordance with these standards will be removed from the publication if malpractice is discovered at any time even after the publication. IJEMT is checking all papers in a peer-review process.

Duties of Editors:

The editor must ensure a fair double-blind peer-review of the submitted articles for publication. They will strive to prevent any potential conflict of interests between the author and editorial and review personnel. Editors will also ensure that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept as confidential before publishing. Editor-in-Chief will coordinate the work of the editors.

Duties of Reviewers:

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on content without regard to ethnic origin, gender, sexual orientation, citizenship, religious belief, or political philosophy of the authors. They must ensure that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept as confidential and must report to the Editor-in-Chief if they are aware of copyright infringement and plagiarism on the author’s side. They must evaluate the submitted works objectively as well as present their opinions on the works clearly in the review form. A reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor-in-Chief and excuse himself from the review process.

Duties of Authors:

Reporting standards: Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention: Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, if practicable, and should, in any event, be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism: The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication: An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources: Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where others have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects: If the work involves chemicals, procedures, or equipment that has any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must identify these in the manuscript. If the author involves a human or animal in the study, he must submit ethical committee permission details to the editor along with the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published work: When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her published work, the author should promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Peer Review Policies:

Peer review is the major quality to keep measure for any academic journal. In this process, experts in the relevant fields, analyze the scholarly work from every perception, including its writing, the accuracy of its technical content, its documentation, and its impact on and implication to the discipline.

Reviewers play a pivotal role in scholarly publishing, and their valuable opinions certify the quality of the article under thoughtfulness. Peer review helps to approve research, establishing a standard for evaluation within research communities.

IJEMT-International Journal of Engineering, Management & Technology employs the peer review process to maintain academic standards and ensure the validity of individual works submitted for publication. Also, it follows a single-blinded peer review process, to ensure independent editorial decision-making.

Depending on reviewer commentary and recommendations, manuscripts may be sent back to authors for revision. After the assistant editor receives the revised manuscript, it is assigned to the reviewer(s) once again, for approval of changes. But the final decision to publish is made by the Editor-in-Chief.

IJEMT-International Journal of Engineering, Management & Technology will grant a double-blinded peer-review process upon an author´s request, and this requires the prior approval of the Editor-in-Chief.

Reviewer Guidelines:

International Journal of Engineering, Management & Technology (IJEMT) Proudly thanks to its potential reviewers for the entire Peer review process and it is very essential for the Journal for Publication for any type of article is published in IJEMT.

Instructions to Reviewer:

1. The reviewer has to confirm his/her approval on the request after receiving mail.
2. The reviewer Doesn’t download the Review manuscript from the dashboard.
3. The reviewer doesn’t contact the author with Email and Call.
4. Reviewer Doesn’t disclose the article details to anyone.
5. The reviewer should evaluate the assigned manuscript within one week.
6. The reviewer directly submits his/her comments and suggestions to the Editor by Email.
7. Reviewer must be aware of our guideline for Manuscript Preparation.
8. Finally, Editor-in-Chief will decide whether the assigned manuscript is accepted/rejected